→ saltlake: 那圖書館管理科系這麼敏感的系，當年冷戰期間，自由陣營11/24 15:10
→ saltlake: 多少個國家加以廢除或者嚴審任教和入學資格?11/24 15:11
Book censorship in the United States
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_censorship_in_the_United_States
Books have been suppressed for their political content by local governments
and school districts. In particular books that some perceive to promote
anarchism, communism or socialism have a history of being suppressed in the
United States.[70] The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels
was frequently challenged and widely restricted in libraries because of its
communist ideas, especially during the Red Scare in the 1950s.
關於美國圖書審查制度，與共產主義相關的書籍當時是被抑制的，
共產黨宣言在五零年代的美國的各圖書館也是被限制的。
再看<蘇聯圖書館事業初探>
http://joemls.dils.tku.edu.tw/en/issues/detail/?articleId=21209
The People's Library of Red Russia in 1950s was the so-called Culture Base of
Socialism. The librarians were the advance guards at the USSR culture front;
each of them being the propagandist, incendiary, and transmitter of
Lenin-Stalin's Thought, as well as the loyal assistant of the Red Russia
Government and Communist Party to educate (i, e., slave) their labor people.
Therefore, a conclusion can be reached that People's Library in USSR assume
two duties given by the Russian Communist Party: one to be the place of
political brainwashing, the other to be the channel to issue its governmental
orders.
五零年代紅色蘇聯的人民圖書館被稱作是社會主義的文化基地，
圖書館員被稱作是蘇聯的文化前線守衛者。
所以無論是對自由美國或是共產蘇聯，圖書館都是意識形態戰爭的重要據點。
因此對於崇拜共產主義的馬克思和切格瓦拉的陳菊而言，圖書館資訊科不是隨便選的。
蔣經國的日記提到多次提到陳菊也不是隨便提的。
美國要出手搭救陳菊案件也不是基於人權或民主。
就是看出陳菊有值得利用的潛力，將來插手兩岸政治是個好棋子。
奇貨可居！
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 180.217.45.226 (臺灣)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/historia/M.1732452485.A.02E.html
留言